The Most Dangerous Officer the US Air Force
Ever Had; Major Harold L. Hering
Major Harold L. Hering was expected to be promoted to Lieutenant Colonel until he posed a very dangerous situation for not only the US Armed Forces, but for the entire nation, indeed the entire world as well.
While serving with a Minuteman missile crew; during training at Vandenberg Air Force Base in late 1973, he asked the question;
"How can I know that an order to launch my missiles came from a sane president?" [ italics mine]
Soon after he was shit-canned from the US Air Force with an administrative discharge. For his full story for asking that question, there are plenty links to it on the internet.
The idea that one would question the validity of an order from the highest rank of the chain of command, in this case the Commander-In-Chief. How could you run any chain of command, in either the public or private sector, if an order came down which you had to question the mental soundness of the order-giver himself?
I mean it is a chain of command, so if the president was bat-shit crazy, you next would have to question every link up and down, from the top to the bottom, in the chain of command. Since only some one bat-shit crazy would follow the orders of a superior who was bat-shit crazy, because he was following the orders of a superior who was bat-shit crazy.
So my answer to the question is "How could you launch missiles to kill hundreds of millions, knowing that at the same time it was happening on the other side; they would launch missiles to kill hundreds of millions on your side?" That the acronym was called M.A.D. - Mutually Assured Destruction; and that only some one bat-shit crazy would initiate mutual homicide/suicide.
Obviously, Major Harold L. Hering was unfit for duty. --- Diogenes Ltd.
Monday, January 30, 2017
American Psychosis (from @Truthdig)
American Psychosis (from @Truthdig): The barrage of lies from demagogues such as Donald Trump creates profound cognitive dissonance among the population that ends in a nationwide collective mental illness.
- 2017/01/29
- 2017/01/29
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Thursday, January 19, 2017
Historic and Contemporary State-Sanctioned Homicides;
Divide to Conquer, To Keep Conquered Keep Divided.
Maintaining The Pecking Order Through Violence
(reprinted and revised from roaddogking.blogspot.com
December 12, 2016)
From the 1880's through the 1950's over 3,000 mostly African-American males were lynched in the USA with the explicit state-sanction for these homicides and other crimes of violence by the ubiquitous permission of law enforcement, by at the very least non-interference by not resulting in arrest and prosecution.
This served the purposes of, especially in the South, the Dixiecrats to exploit white-trash over discontent in particular when cotton crop prices fell. As Negro lynching rose in proportion to the depressed cotton market. To divert the white trash, pissed off and despondent, to vent their ill will upon those lower than them in the social strata, Negros.
Otherwise the economically hard-hit peckerwoods might stir shit to disrupt the standing of the wealthy Dixiecrats; who would fund the Ku Klux Klan as provocateurs, to stir fears of the black man's lust for white women. Who might then breed out the white family lineages with the gene pool of the black population.
As in the manner of the Bush Administration after 9 -11. By stoking fears of Weapons of Mass Destruction to invade Iraq, who were not in complicity with the Islamic terrorists harbored in the more formidable mountains of Afghanistan. Of course, the removal of Saddam Hussein created a vacuum for Islamic and Jihadist extremists like ISIS to fill the void of a nation that had been religiously tolerant. As Hussein's cabinet had those from Christian families at the center of power. Now Christian children are beheaded in Iraq.
To paraphrase Henry David Thoreau; as boys who cannot get at The Man, will abuse the softer target of his dog.
But the State-Sanction for criminal cabals like the Dixiecrats did not end when Negro lynching fell out of favor. Just nowadays the state-sanction given, for homicides and other acts of violence and brutality, is less overt and more ubiquitous in regards to the Designated Victim. As the Nazis did not at first target Jews but Trade-Unionists and Communists in the beginning.
White or black, young or old, child or elderly, male or female, poor or even affluent; ALL became potential targets as the Designated Victims. As now the Dixiecrats have a new name, formally so to speak in criminal circles, The Chain. Operating from town to town across the interstate counties, North and South, to serve the agendas and business interests of Gangsterism and Thuggery. Which uses violence and brutality to cement social control and hierarchy; by keeping the pecking order, the status quo, in its proper place.
---------- Diogenes Ltd. 2017
Divide to Conquer, To Keep Conquered Keep Divided.
Maintaining The Pecking Order Through Violence
(reprinted and revised from roaddogking.blogspot.com
December 12, 2016)
From the 1880's through the 1950's over 3,000 mostly African-American males were lynched in the USA with the explicit state-sanction for these homicides and other crimes of violence by the ubiquitous permission of law enforcement, by at the very least non-interference by not resulting in arrest and prosecution.
This served the purposes of, especially in the South, the Dixiecrats to exploit white-trash over discontent in particular when cotton crop prices fell. As Negro lynching rose in proportion to the depressed cotton market. To divert the white trash, pissed off and despondent, to vent their ill will upon those lower than them in the social strata, Negros.
Otherwise the economically hard-hit peckerwoods might stir shit to disrupt the standing of the wealthy Dixiecrats; who would fund the Ku Klux Klan as provocateurs, to stir fears of the black man's lust for white women. Who might then breed out the white family lineages with the gene pool of the black population.
As in the manner of the Bush Administration after 9 -11. By stoking fears of Weapons of Mass Destruction to invade Iraq, who were not in complicity with the Islamic terrorists harbored in the more formidable mountains of Afghanistan. Of course, the removal of Saddam Hussein created a vacuum for Islamic and Jihadist extremists like ISIS to fill the void of a nation that had been religiously tolerant. As Hussein's cabinet had those from Christian families at the center of power. Now Christian children are beheaded in Iraq.
To paraphrase Henry David Thoreau; as boys who cannot get at The Man, will abuse the softer target of his dog.
But the State-Sanction for criminal cabals like the Dixiecrats did not end when Negro lynching fell out of favor. Just nowadays the state-sanction given, for homicides and other acts of violence and brutality, is less overt and more ubiquitous in regards to the Designated Victim. As the Nazis did not at first target Jews but Trade-Unionists and Communists in the beginning.
White or black, young or old, child or elderly, male or female, poor or even affluent; ALL became potential targets as the Designated Victims. As now the Dixiecrats have a new name, formally so to speak in criminal circles, The Chain. Operating from town to town across the interstate counties, North and South, to serve the agendas and business interests of Gangsterism and Thuggery. Which uses violence and brutality to cement social control and hierarchy; by keeping the pecking order, the status quo, in its proper place.
---------- Diogenes Ltd. 2017
Friday, January 13, 2017
See video below; It is now a shame that I was
once a member of a Buddhist sangha
Rohingya Muslims in Buddhist Myanmar; Untouchables of Hinduism in India - The so-called sainted Mahatma Gandi is in part responsible for the caste system as continued status quo, a caste system as brutal and oppressive as apartheid or segregation ever were. Persecution of Christians in many Islamic countries ongoing for decades, as a teenager I had friends from Pakistan who fled persecution for being Christians.
In the modern era it must be conceded that Christian-dominate nations do not persecute religious minorities. However the Bible has been twisted, distorted and canted to justify any and everything; in the name of rationalizing the any thing goes in politics and profit making.
The noble religious texts praised for their prose and poetry; here as seen below is of the deeds of your creeds that in plunder, destruction, rape and carnage, is but whipped cream on a shit pie to window dress the spilling of blood.
once a member of a Buddhist sangha
Rohingya Muslims in Buddhist Myanmar; Untouchables of Hinduism in India - The so-called sainted Mahatma Gandi is in part responsible for the caste system as continued status quo, a caste system as brutal and oppressive as apartheid or segregation ever were. Persecution of Christians in many Islamic countries ongoing for decades, as a teenager I had friends from Pakistan who fled persecution for being Christians.
In the modern era it must be conceded that Christian-dominate nations do not persecute religious minorities. However the Bible has been twisted, distorted and canted to justify any and everything; in the name of rationalizing the any thing goes in politics and profit making.
The noble religious texts praised for their prose and poetry; here as seen below is of the deeds of your creeds that in plunder, destruction, rape and carnage, is but whipped cream on a shit pie to window dress the spilling of blood.
Sunday, January 8, 2017
RUINS: "My Thoughts Are Murder To The State" -- Thoreau "...
RUINS: "My Thoughts Are Murder To The State" -- Thoreau "...: A thought from Henry David Thoreau that was happened upon: "I walk toward one of our ponds, but what signifies the beauty of natu...
Forest Ranger Explains That Trees Have Social Networks And Complex Relationships
Forest Ranger Explains That Trees Have Social Networks And Complex Relationships: A forest ranger from Germany explains in his book that trees are loving and have a number of mysterious abilities.
Saturday, January 7, 2017
Friday, January 6, 2017
Outlaw; legal definition of,
" In historic legal systems, an outlaw is declared as outside the protection of the law. In pre-modern societies the criminal is withdrawn all legal protection, so that anyone is legally empowered to persecute or kill them" --- (source) Wikipedia
IF one were barred from civil rights and civil protection; could there not be an off-set in a gain of absolving one from civic compliance and civic responsibility?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conspiracy Without Foresight;
Landscaping Service
Removing the weeds and trimming down the overgrowth. Society, civilizations from the dawn of History to today,has had mechanisms for such to deal with the social surplus -- wealth generated beyond what was needed for sustenance -- why government came about in the first place, to tax and take away that which may, in itself, grow too strong and out of control if not subject to reduction of its vigor upon the collective.
But what was a weed as opposed to a flower? And what was overgrowth as opposed to economic wealth? It soon became what ever in the eyes of the subjective beholder. And what ever was good for the collective was a question of what therefore good for the one or the few as opposed to the many.
The individual versus the collective. Or was it the collective deciding to define what was for the good of the individual? That the wants of the peoples that were soon to be the needs of the peoples of what was before not needed. And the individual was to be defined by society's limitations.
I dislike the word conspiracy unless it is strictly used to define the legal term of the criminal offense. "Conspiracy Theory" is often rightly maligned because what falls under the umbrella of the conspiracy theorists is not even a crime, but obscured machinations at best.
Here I use the words Conspiracy without foresight because even though it encompasses activities that fall under the criminal definition, it depends more on consensus than a conscious design or deliberate agenda. And has no need for central controllers or cabals even when they are present.
Just the Same Old Song and Dance civilizations and societies play from century to century from the rise and fall of the Roman Empire and to the fall of the USA; like linked chain on a railroad track moving along to the same destination of oblivion. --- Diogenes Ltd.
" In historic legal systems, an outlaw is declared as outside the protection of the law. In pre-modern societies the criminal is withdrawn all legal protection, so that anyone is legally empowered to persecute or kill them" --- (source) Wikipedia
IF one were barred from civil rights and civil protection; could there not be an off-set in a gain of absolving one from civic compliance and civic responsibility?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conspiracy Without Foresight;
Landscaping Service
Removing the weeds and trimming down the overgrowth. Society, civilizations from the dawn of History to today,has had mechanisms for such to deal with the social surplus -- wealth generated beyond what was needed for sustenance -- why government came about in the first place, to tax and take away that which may, in itself, grow too strong and out of control if not subject to reduction of its vigor upon the collective.
But what was a weed as opposed to a flower? And what was overgrowth as opposed to economic wealth? It soon became what ever in the eyes of the subjective beholder. And what ever was good for the collective was a question of what therefore good for the one or the few as opposed to the many.
The individual versus the collective. Or was it the collective deciding to define what was for the good of the individual? That the wants of the peoples that were soon to be the needs of the peoples of what was before not needed. And the individual was to be defined by society's limitations.
I dislike the word conspiracy unless it is strictly used to define the legal term of the criminal offense. "Conspiracy Theory" is often rightly maligned because what falls under the umbrella of the conspiracy theorists is not even a crime, but obscured machinations at best.
Here I use the words Conspiracy without foresight because even though it encompasses activities that fall under the criminal definition, it depends more on consensus than a conscious design or deliberate agenda. And has no need for central controllers or cabals even when they are present.
Just the Same Old Song and Dance civilizations and societies play from century to century from the rise and fall of the Roman Empire and to the fall of the USA; like linked chain on a railroad track moving along to the same destination of oblivion. --- Diogenes Ltd.
Monday, January 2, 2017
Sunday, January 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)